Xarxa Gospel de Catalunya

juliol 4th, 2011 No comments

LA XARXA GOSPEL DE CATALUNYA, és, en essència, una entitat vinculada a la Xarxa de les Cases de Música Popular que pretén dinamitzar la música gospel a Catalunya, impulsant i gestionant cors de gospel, així com realitzar activitats vinculades amb aquest estil musical.
Actualment pertanyen a la Xarxa els cors: Gospel Sons de Mataró, Gospel Hearts de L’Hospitalet, Esclat Gospel Singers de Manresa, Barcelona Gospel Messengers, Argentona Cor de Gospel, Cor de Gospel de Montmeló i Ubuntu de Barcelona.
Eixos de treball:
* assessorament dels cors;
* pedagogia;
* accions;
* produccions.
La Xarxa està liderada per l’expert pianista Ramon Escalè.
És d’agrair un apartat a la Web per difondre partitures corals, la majoria arranjades per en Ramon Escalè.
Celebro aquesta iniciativa, llarga vida.

Joan Margarit

juny 29th, 2011 1 comment

Avui he rebut un entranyable correu-electrònic de la Carme Urgell que hem deia
“Bon dia Miquel,
A la revista digital Sonograma he trobat aquest poema de Joan Margarit relacionat amb el jazz (o jaç?) i el saxo. M’ha agradat i te l’envio per si el vols al teu blog.
Petonassos” que m’ha suggerit aquest post. És de justícia dedicar-li un espai del blog a Joan Margarit, sobradament merescut especialment des de la seva faceta de gran coneixedor i afeccionat a la música de Jazz. Algun dia hauríem de parlar de la seva obra relacionada amb el Jazz, de moment comencem amb aquest poema inspirat en l’apassionada i emotiva interpretació de’n Charlie Parker del 1946 sobre “Lover Man (Oh, Where Can You Be?)”. És un tema amb una estructura de 32 amb pont, composat el 1941 per Jimmy Davis, Ram Ramírez i Jimmy Sherman, expressament per la Billie Holiday que el va immortalitzar 1944.

Agraiments a la Carme per aquesta referència.

Transcribe!

març 27th, 2011 No comments

Col·lega! Et recomano una eina imprescindible per practicar nous temes, estudiar-los amb deteniment, millorar tècnica, etc. Em refereixo al software “Transcribe!” de Seventh String.  És una aplicació molt senzilla d’instal·lar i disposa de les diverses versions dels sistemes operatius. L’aplicació et permet captar qualsevol tema en versió MP3 i modificar-lo tant en el tempo com en la tonalitat i, això és el més impressionant: sense distorsionar ni el só ni els harmònics dels instruments, ni deteriorar la qualitat de la interpretació original. Per tant és com tocar en una versió original modificada a la teva conveniència.

És molt útil per diverses coses com expliquen els autors en la seva web, però per sobre de tot per estudiar temes complicats bé sigui pel fraseig o be pel tempo en que estan interpretats és una gran ajuda. Pensa que es pot reduir el tempo fins el 20%, i això pels que anem limitats de tècnica és un gran recurs: el tempo és una de les grans barreres de la interpretació musical! L’aplicació també permet canviar de tonalitat en 12 mitjos tons amunt o avall. És increïble! Aquesta gran troballa li dec a l’amic Pere Corella.

No t’ho pensis més i baixat la versió de prova. Et quedaràs impressionat. Si et decideixes a adquirir la llicència, actualment considero que és assequible (US$ 50) especialment per les barreres que et permet saltar.

A gaudir-ho!!

Hard Bop

gener 15th, 2011 No comments

El juny de 2009 recollia en aquest Blog la següent descripció de l’estil Hard Bop:

“Hard bop is a style of jazz that is an extension of bebop (or “bop”) music. Hard bop incorporates influences from rhythm and blues, gospel music, and blues, especially in the saxophone and piano playing.
David H. Rosenthal also contends in his book Hard Bop that it is to a large degree the natural creation of a generation of black American musicians who grew up at a time when bop and rhythm and blues were the dominant forms of black American music and prominent jazz musicians like Tadd Dameron worked in both genres.
Hard bop was developed in the mid-1950s, partly in response to the vogue for cool jazz that became popular in the early 1950s. A simplistic definition states that cool jazz, or “west coast” jazz, emphasized the more European elements of the music, deriving to a great extent from the “chamber jazz” experiments of the Miles Davis nonet, while hard bop brought the church and gospel music back into jazz, emphasizing the African elements. In fact, both cool and hard bop contain European and African elements, but the simplistic definition offers a short-hand way of addressing the difference. The hard bop style coalesced in 1953 and 1954, paralleling the rise of rhythm and blues, the latter developed by African-American musicians in part as a means of giving their audiences dance music in the wake of the decline of the swing bands, and the abandonment of jazz as a music to dance by as bebop emerged, with its intricacies and emphasis on being a serious listening experience.
In 1954, Davis’ performance of the title track of his album Walkin’ at the very first Newport Jazz Festival, held that same year, announced the style to the jazz world. Davis would form his first great quintet with John Coltrane later in the year to play hard bop, before moving on to other things. Other key documents were the two volumes of the Blue Note albums A Night at Birdland, also from 1954, recorded at the legendary jazz club months before the Davis set at Newport. The quintet by Art Blakey featured pianist Horace Silver and trumpeter Clifford Brown, all of whom would be leaders in the hard bop movement along with Davis. Blakey and Silver would start the seminal band The Jazz Messengers, although Silver would leave to front his own hard-bop groups in 1956, and Brown formed the other trend-setting hard bop band with drummer Max Roach, the Brown-Roach Quintet.
The hard bop style enjoyed its greatest popularity in the 1950s and 1960s, but hard bop performers, and elements of the music, remain popular in jazz. According to Nat Hentoff in his 1957 liner notes for the Blakey Columbia LP of the same name, the phrase “hard bop” was originated by critic-pianist John Mehegan, jazz reviewer of the New York Herald Tribune at that time. Soul jazz developed from hard bop.
Other musicians who contributed prominently to the hard bop style include Cannonball Adderley, Donald Byrd, Sonny Clark, Lou Donaldson, Kenny Drew, Benny Golson, Dexter Gordon, Joe Henderson, Andrew Hill, Freddie Hubbard, Jackie McLean, Charles Mingus, Blue Mitchell, Hank Mobley, Thelonious Monk, Lee Morgan, and Sonny Rollins”.

Actualment, o sigui desprès de més de cinquanta anys d’haver sorgit aquest nou estil penso, i que em perdoni l’Hugues Panassié,  que no tenen cap fonament els prejudicis i exclusions tant injustos i immerescuts que se’ls hi van dedicar a aquests grans musics per haver empés aquest interessant camí que per poc que si profunditza es reconeix el bo i millor de les arrels més profundes del Jazz. Des de fa molts anys el Hard Bop és el “Mainstream” del Jazz i tots els musics s’han format en les seves bases i pel que sembla això encara donarà molts fruits durant molts anys.

En aquest apartat intentaré fer una selecció dels temes més característics d’aquest estil. De moment comencem amb el gran Art Blakey (Abdullah Ibn Buhaina). L’emblemàtic “Moanin’ “del 1958, de Jon Hendricks i Bobby Timmons, tema amb una estructura amb pont de 32(AABA) i una interpretació magistral en directe amb els grans Jazz Messengers: Lee Morgan(tp), Benny Golson(ts), Bobby Timmons(p), Jymie Merrit (b), Art Blakey (dm).

Del mateix concert “Whisper Not”:

En un concert en el Jazzfest Wiesen 1989, Art Blakey & The New Jazz Messengers format per Bryan Lynch(tp), Terence Tony(as), Javon Jackson (ts), Frank Lacy(tb), Bennie Green(p), Essiet Okun Essiet (b), Art Blakey(dm). Intrepreten el legendari “Blues March” que torna a les arrels de New Orleans. Brutal!


Mor el productor Bobby Robinson

gener 9th, 2011 No comments

Harlem legend dead Bobby Robinson, owner of Happy House on 125th St.”

By David HINCKLEY, DAILY NEWS STAFF WRITER. Saturday, January 8th 2011, 10:33 AM

Musician, personality and business owner Bobby Robinson owned Happy House Records for more than 60 years.

Foto de Roberts for News

Musician, personality and business owner Bobby Robinson owned Happy House Records for more than 60 years.

BOBBY ROBINSON, whose tiny record shop on Harlem‘s 125th St. spawned No. 1 national hits and made him an uptown patriarch for six decades, died yesterday.

He was 93 and had been ill for several years – though he regularly went to work at his shop until it was forced to close in January 2008.

Impeccably dressed, well-spoken and ambitious to make his mark in the entertainment business, Robinson opened Bobby’s Happy House in 1946.

His shop was the first black-owned business on 125th St., and within five years he used it to launch a series of record labels.

Sometimes working with his brother Danny, who also had an office on 125th St., Robinson recorded hundreds of artists from Gladys Knight and the Pips to Grandmaster Flash and the Furious Five.

Knight’s first hit, “Every Beat of My Heart,” was released on Robinson’s Fury label.

Robinson, a South Carolina native, had a No. 1 national hit in 1959 with Wilbert Harrison‘s “Kansas City” – and said years later that a hit of that magnitude crippled his business because he had to press so many copies he couldn’t promote any other artists.

But his Red Robin, Whirlin’ Disc, Fire, Fury and Enjoy labels became legendary in the rhythm and blues world, and his releases by artists like the Channels, Teenchords and Scarlets helped define the sound of the New York streets through the 1950s.

Robinson ultimately recorded a wide range of artists that included the great bluesman Elmore James, whom Robinson inducted into the Rock and Roll Hall of Fame.

In the late 1970s, Robinson became one of the first label owners to record rap music, cutting artists like Flash, Doug E. Fresh and Spoonie Gee.

Robinson eventually had to move the shop around the corner in the late 1990s, and he closed for good on Jan. 21, 2008, when his new landlord decided to raze the building for a development.

“I’ve seen 125th St. at its best and worst,” Robinson said in late 2007. “And I’ll tell you, there’s no more exciting place in the world.”

Font “New York Dailynews

Visitar “Bobby Robinson Tribute

Veure la ressenya complementaria i prou interessant de Fernando Navarro “Muere Bobby Robinson, legendario productor de música negra de Harlem” publicada el 10/01/2011 en el seu blog “Route 66. La Ruta norteamericana” de “El País”

Veure la extraordinària ressenya de Douglas MARTIN “Bobby Robinson, Harlem Music Impresario, Dies at 93” publicada el 12/01/2011 al New York Times

Kind of Blue: Jazz Modal

novembre 21st, 2010 No comments

Kind of Blue fou enregistrat entre el 2 de març i el 22 d’abril de 1959 en els estudis de Columbia Records de New York pel sextet format per Miles Davis (tp), Julian “Cannonball” Adderley (as), John Coltrane (ts), Bill Evans (p), Paul Chambers (b) i Jimmy Cobb (dm). Es van enregistrar cinc temes que avui són ja llegendaris: “Freddie Freeloader” (enregistrat el 3/2, amb Wynton Kelly substituint a Bill Evans al piano); “So what” i “Blue in Green” (enregistrats el 3/2); “All blues” i “Flamenco sketches” (enregistrats el 4/6).
Tots els temes de Kind of Blue són “modals” en contrast amb els treballs anteriors bàsicament fonamentats en les progressions harmòniques (els “chord changes”) pròpies del be bop i el hard bop. Miles Davis en aquella època, gairebé vint anys després que en Charlie Parker i Dizzy Guillespi “inventesin” el be-bop, ja començava a ser molt crític amb la creixent complexitat harmònica que anaven adquirint els temes del repertori usual, sobrecarregats harmònicament i que segons ell inhibien la creativitat dels intèrprets. Miles seguia atentament la proposta que des del 1953 estava desenvolupant en George Russell consistent en un nou sistema musical per la improvitsació basat en escales o modus que va ser denominat “modal” en contraposició al sistema “chord changes” del be-bop. En Miles juntament amb Bill Evans van fer una primera experiència amb Milestones (1958) que va ser l’excusa per muntar Kind of Blue. Sembla ser que l’àlbum va ser compost com una sèrie d’esbossos de conjunts d’escales que definien els paràmetres de la improvisació i l’estil de cada intèrpret, en lloc de fer-ho amb l’habitual graella d’acords. Aquesta forma de composició representava segons deia en Davis “un retorn a la línia melòdica”, absolutament denostada pels boppers i que havia acabat en una mena de rutina consistent en arpegiar amb fruïció i virtuosisme sobre els “chord changes”, fent rodes incansablement del tema de manera un tant monòtona. Per en Davis retornar a la melodia sobre una base d’acords mínima (tant mínima que es reduïa a un sol acord per tota l’estructura del tema i en tot cas cambiaba d’acord per diferenciar el pont de la resta, o introduir un tournaround) representava un nou repta de creativitat.


Aquest àlbum immediatament va tenir una gran repercussió en els músics i la seva influència va ser determinant tant en el Jazz, com en el Rock i fins i tot en la música clàssica. És un obra de ruptura amb el be bop que es consolida definitivament amb el “Giant Steps” (1960) de John Coltrane. En qualsevol cas els temes de Kind of Blue avui en dia, cinquanta anys després de la seva creació, constitueixen un llegat important del Jazz que qualsevol músic hauria d’haver estudiat. La oportunitat que ofereixen les transcripcions de Rob DuBoff, Mark Vinci, Mark Davis i John Davis, editades l’any 2000 per Hal Leonard (ISBN 0-634-01169-3) amb el títol de “Miles Davis. Kind of Blue. Transcribed scores”, és un llibre de partitures de 64 pàgines. Aquestes transcripcions són una oportunitat d’or per anar a les fonts i estudiar aquestes improvitsacions com un exercici a partir d’unes transcripcions precises i de qualitat. Cal remarcar que en el llibre hi trobaràs les transcripcions en línies separades de tots i cadascun dels intèrprets, per tant poca broma, si no tens el material ja l’estàs buscant.

A continuació t’afegeixo una descripció de cada un d’aquests cinc temes del àlbum tant emblemàtics tots ells.

“So What” is the first track on the album. “So What” is one of the best known examples of modal jazz, set in the Dorian mode and consisting of 16 bars of D Dorian, followed by eight bars of E♭ Dorian and another eight of D Dorian. This AABA structure puts it in the thirty-two bar format of American popular song. The piano-and-bass introduction for the piece was written by Gil Evans for Bill Evans and Paul Chambers on Kind of Blue. The introduction attributed to Gil Evans, which is closely based on the opening measures of French composer Claude Debussy’s Voiles (1910), the second prelude from his first collection of preludes. An orchestrated version by Gil Evans of this introduction is later to be found on a television broadcast given by Miles’ Quintet (minus Cannonball Adderley who was ill that day) and the Gil Evans Orchestra; the orchestra gave the introduction, after which the quintet played the rest of “So What”. The distinctive voicing employed by Bill Evans for the chords that interject the head, from the bottom up three perfect fourths followed by a major third, has been given the name “So What chord” by such theorists as Mark Levine. While the track is taken at a very moderate tempo on Kind Of Blue, it is played at an extremely fast tempo on later live recordings by the Quintet, such as Four and More. The same chord structure was later used by John Coltrane for his standard “Impressions”.

“Freddie Freeloader” is the second track on the album. The piece takes the form of a twelve-bar blues in B-flat, but the chord over the final two bars of each chorus is an A-flat7, not the traditional B-flat7 followed by either F7 for a turnaround or some variation of B-flat7 for an ending. Davis employed Wynton Kelly as the pianist for this track in place of Bill Evans, as Kelly was something of a blues specialist. The solos are by Miles Davis, John Coltrane, Cannonball Adderley, and Wynton Kelly. According to the documentary Kind of Blue: Made in Heaven, the song was named after an individual named Freddie who would frequently try to see the music Davis and others performed without paying (thus freeloading). The name may have also been inspired by Red Skelton’s most famous character, “Freddie the Freeloader” the hobo clown. “Freddie Freeloader” has proven to be one of Davis’ most enduring compositions.

“Blue in Green” is the third track on the album. One of two ballads on the LP, “Blue in Green”‘s melody is very modal, incorporating the presence of the dorian, mixolydian, and lydian modes. The first measure is a G minor chord with an added natural 13 (Gm13), which contains an F natural but the modality of the piece is already evident as the opening note of the melody is an E natural, which is the leading tone of the F major scale. The natural 13 of the chord is E natural. It has long been speculated that pianist Bill Evans wrote “Blue in Green”, even though the LP and most jazz fakebooks credit Davis only with its composition. In his autobiography, Davis maintains that he alone composed the songs on Kind of Blue. The version on Evans’ trio album Portrait in Jazz, recorded in 1959, credits the tune to ‘Davis-Evans’. Earl Zindars, in an interview conducted by Win Hinkle, said that “Blue in Green” was 100-percent written by Bill Evans. In a 1978 radio interview, Evans said that he himself had written the song. In a recording made in December 1958 or January 1959 for Chet Baker’s album Chet (prior to the Kind of Blue sessions), Evans’ introduction on the jazz standard “Alone Together” has been directly compared to his playing on “Blue in Green”.

“All Blues” is the forth on the album. It is a 12 bar blues in 6/8; the chord sequence is that of a basic blues and made up entirely of 7th chords, with a ♭VI in the turnaround instead of just the usual V chord. In the song’s original key of G this chord is an E♭7. The piece is made even more distinctive by the bass vamp that repeats through the whole piece, except when a V or ♭VI chord is reached (the 9th and 10th bars of a chorus). Further to this, there is a harmonically similar vamp that is played by the horns (the two saxophones in the case of Kind of Blue) at the beginning and then (usually) continued by the piano under any solos that take place. Each chorus is usually separated by a four-bar vamp which acts as an introduction to the next solo/chorus. While originally an instrumental piece and usually performed as such, lyrics were later written for it by Oscar Brown Jr.

“Flamenco Sketches” is the fifth track on the album. The song has no written melody, but is rather defined by a set of chord changes that are improvised over using various modes of the major scale of each tonality. Each musician separately chose the number of bars for each of the modal passages in his solo. Davis gets credit for the song form, but Evans is credited with the opening 4-bar vamp over Cmaj7 and G9sus4, which is the opening theme to his ballad improvisation “Peace Piece.” Because of the presence of this vamp, “Flamenco Sketches” is usually played as a ballad. The modes used in “Flamenco Sketches” are as follows: C Ionian (natural major scale); A♭ Mixolydian (Major with a minor 7th); B♭ Ionian; D Phrygian dominant (Phrygian with F♯ instead of F) (alternates over bass notes D and E♭); G Dorian.

==============

http://www.slate.com/id/2225336/

Kind of Blue
Why the best-selling jazz album of all time is so great.
By Fred KaplanPosted Monday, Aug. 17, 2009

Miles Davis’ Kind of Blue, which was released 50 years ago today, is a nearly unique thing in music or any other creative realm: a huge hit—the best-selling jazz album of all time—and the spearhead of an artistic revolution. Everyone, even people who say they don’t like jazz, likes Kind of Blue. It’s cool, romantic, melancholic, and gorgeously melodic. But why do critics regard it as one of the best jazz albums ever made? What is it about Kind of Blue that makes it not just pleasant but important?

On March 2, 1959, when its first tracks were laid down at Columbia Records’ 30th Street Studio (the album would be released on Aug. 17), Charlie Parker, the exemplar of modern jazz, the greatest alto saxophonist ever, had been dead for four years, almost to the day. The jazz world was still waiting, longing, for “the next Charlie Parker” and wondering where he’d take the music.

Parker and his trumpeter sidekick, Dizzy Gillespie—Bird and Diz, as they were called—had launched the jazz revolution of the 1940s, known as bebop. Their concept was to take a standard blues or ballad and to improvise a whole new melody built on its chord changes. This in itself was nothing new. But they took it to a new level, extending the chords to more intricate patterns, playing them in darting, syncopated phrases, usually at breakneck tempos.

The problem was, Parker not only invented bebop, he perfected it. There were only so many chords you could lay down in a 12-bar blues or a 32-bar song, only so many variations you could play on those chords. By the time he died, even Parker was running out of steam.

When Miles Davis came to New York in 1945, at the age of 19, he replaced Gillespie as Parker’s trumpeter for a few years and played very much in their style. A decade later, he, too, was wondering what to do next.

The answer came from a friend of his named George Russell (who died just last month at the age of 86). A brilliant composer and scholar in his own right, Russell spent the better part of the ’50s devising a new theory of jazz improvisation based not on chord changes but on scales or “modes.” The kind of music that resulted was often called “modal” jazz. (A scale consists of the eight notes from one octave to the next.* A chord consists of three or four specific notes in that scale, played together or in sequence: For instance, a C chord is C-E-G.)

This distinction may seem slight, but its implications were enormous. In a bebop improvisation, the chord changes (which occur when, usually, the pianist changes the harmony from one chord to another) serve as a compass; they point the direction to the next bar or the next phrase. Chords follow a particular pattern (that’s why it’s easy to hum along with most blues and ballads); you know what the next chord will be; you know that the notes you play will consist of the notes that comprise that chord or some variation on them. Playing blues, you know that the sequence of chord changes will be finished in 12 bars (or, if it’s a song, 32 bars), and then you’ll either end your solo or start the sequence again.

Russell threw the compass out the window. You could play all the notes of a scale, which is to say any and all notes. “It is for the musician to sing his own song really,” Russell wrote, “without having to meet the deadline of a particular chord.” In other words, he continued, “you are free to do anything”, “as long as you know where home is”—as long as you know where you’re going to wind up.

One night in 1958, Russell sat down with Davis at a piano and laid out his theory’s possibilities—how to link chords, scales, and melodies in almost unlimited combinations. Miles realized this was a way out of bebop’s cul-de-sac. “Man,” he told Russell, “if Bird was alive, this would kill him.”

In an interview that year with critic Nat Hentoff, Miles explained the new approach. “When you go this way,” he said, “you can go on forever. You don’t have to worry about changes, and you can do more with time. It becomes a challenge to see how melodically inventive you are. … I think a movement in jazz is beginning, away from the conventional string of chords and a return to emphasis on melodic rather than harmonic variations. There will be fewer chords but infinite possibilities as to what to do with them.”

Davis needed one more thing before he could go this route: a pianist who knew how to accompany without playing chords. This was a radical notion. Laying down the chords—supplying the frontline horn players with the compass that kept their improvisations on the right path—was what modern jazz pianists did. Russell recommended someone he’d hired for a few of his own sessions, an intense young white man named Bill Evans.

Evans was conservatory-trained with a penchant for the French Impressionist composers, like Ravel and Debussy, whose harmonies floated airily above the melody line. When Evans started playing jazz, he tended not to play the root of a chord; for instance, when playing a C chord, he’d avoid playing a C note. Instead, he’d play some other note in, or hovering around, the chord, suggesting the chord without locking himself into its restraints.

Davis hired Evans for his next recording date, the session that became Kind of Blue, which would be the perfect expression of this new approach to playing.

The clearest example of its novelty is a piece, composed (without credit) by Evans, called “Flamenco Sketches.” At most jazz sessions, the sheet music that the leader passes around to the band consists of “heads”—the first 12 or so bars of a tune, with the chords notated above. The band plays the head, then each player improvises on the chords. But for “Flamenco Sketches,” Evans had jotted down the notes of five scales, each of which expressed a slightly different mood. At the top of the sheet, he wrote, “Play in the sound of these scales.”

For the band’s two saxophone players, John Coltrane on tenor and Julian “Cannonball” Adderley on alto, it was a particularly bizarre instruction. Both were astonishingly adept improvisers, but they built their creations strictly on chords, Adderley as an acolyte of Charlie Parker (with a gospel-infused tone), Coltrane as an almost spiritual explorer, searching for the right sound, the right note, mapping out his voyage on charts of chords, piling and inverting chords on top of chords, expanding each note of a chord to a new chord, not knowing which combinations might work and therefore trying them all.

A few months after the Kind of Blue sessions, Coltrane led his own band on an album called Giant Steps, which pressed this quest to its ultimate degree—literally:

Giant Steps marked the end of the bebop frontier; Coltrane knew this, and, afterward, would go in a whole new direction, less tethered to structure, more “free,” than even Russell’s concept envisioned. But on Kind of Blue, especially “Flamenco Sketches,” he took his first—and most lyrical—step out on that brink:

The departure from bebop is clear from the album’s opening tune, “So What,” which would emerge as this new sound’s anthem. Evans describes it on the album’s liner notes as “a simple figure based on 16 measures of one scale, 8 of another and 8 more of the first … in free rhythmic style.” (Loose as it is, this was more structured than some of the pieces. Evans writes that, for “Flamenco Sketches,” the improvisations on each scale can last “as long as the soloist wishes.”) In this 30-second clip from “So What,” Davis improvises on a single scale for all but the last few seconds, when Evans signals a shift to a different scale:

Compare this with “Freddie Freeloader,” the album’s only conventional blues. (For this track alone, Miles let his usual pianist, Wynton Kelly, a straight blues-and-bebop keyboardist, sit in for Evans):

Structurally, it’s similar to the early bebop tunes that Davis played with Parker in the mid-1940s, the melody latched to the pianist’s chord changes, which occur nearly every bar, as in this 1946 Parker recording of “Ornithology” with Davis as sideman:

Now contrast these conventional bop pieces with the most fully developed piece of “modal” jazz” on Kind of Blue, called “All Blues”:

It has the same feel as the other blues tunes,­­ but listen closely: The horns, blowing harmony in the background, are playing the same notes in each bar; they’re not shifting them to follow the chord changes; there are no chord changes. It sounds (hence the album’s title) kind of blue.

So Kind of Blue sounded different from the jazz that came before it. But what made it so great? The answer here is simple: the musicians. Throughout his career, certainly through the 1950s and ’60s, Miles Davis was an instinctively brilliant recruiter; a large percentage of his sidemen went on to be great leaders, and these sidemen—especially Evans, Coltrane, and Adderley—were among his greatest. They came to the date, were handed music that allowed them unprecedented freedom (to sing their “own song,” as Russell put it), and they lived up to the challenge, usually on the first take; they had a lot of their own song to sing.

The album’s legacy is mixed, precisely for this reason. It opened up a whole new path of freedom to jazz musicians: Those who had something to say thrived; those who didn’t, noodled. That’s the dark side of what Miles Davis and George Russell (and, a few months later, Ornette Coleman, in his own even-freer style of jazz) wrought: a lot of noodling—New Age noodling, jazz-rock-fusion noodling, blaring-and-squealing noodling—all of it baleful, boring, and deadly (literally deadly, given the rise of tight and riveting rock ‘n’ roll). Some of their successors confused freedom with just blowing whatever came into their heads, and it turned out there wasn’t much there.

Another appealing thing about Kind of Blue, though it’s also a heartbreaking thing: There was no sequel. Soon after the recording date, the band broke up. Evans formed his own piano trio; Adderley went back to playing gospel-tinged bop; Coltrane (after making Giant Steps) took his own road to freedom; Davis, too, retreated to earlier forms for the next few years, until he formed his next great band, in the mid-’60s, with younger musicians who pushed him on to more adventurous experiments.

Kind of Blue is a one-shot deal, so dreamily perfect you can hardly believe someone created it. Which is why it remains so deeply satisfying, on whatever level you experience it, as moody background music or as the center of your existence. Listen to it 100 times or so, and you still marvel at its spontaneous inventions; now and then, you’ll even hear something new.

Correction, Aug. 19, 2009: The article originally stated that a scale consists of 12 notes, which is true for chromatic scales (scales with all the notes—natural, flat, and sharp), but since Russell was talking about scales or “modes” that sound different from one another (meaning they include at least some different notes), this can be true only of scales with eight tones or eight notes. (Return to the corrected sentence.)

How Jazz Can Change Your Life

novembre 8th, 2010 No comments

Et recomano llegir “Moving to Higher Ground: How Jazz Can Change Your Life”, escrit per en Wynton Marsalis i Geoffrey C. Ward, de 185 pàgines, editat el 2008 per Random House Inc., NY.

Com veuràs el sumari és prou il·lustratiu del seu contingut:

Introduction. “Now That’s Jazz”.
Chapter ONE. Discovering the Joy of Swinging (page 3).
Chapter TWO. Speaking the Language of Jazz (page 21).
CChapter THREE. Everybody’s Music: The Blues (page 47).
Chapter FOUR. What it Takes – and How it Feels – to Play (page 63).
Chapter FIVE. The Great Coming-Together (page 87).
Chapter SIX. Lessons from the Masters (page 109).
Chapter SEVEN. That Thing with No Name (page 157)

El paper de lideratge d’una determinada manera de veure el jazz, la que podríem dir “re-generació” que ha encapçalat en Wynton Marsalis des dels anys ‘80 és indiscutible i avui tothom li respecte el seu referent fins el punt de que se li va encomanar la direcció del Lincoln Centre de NY. Durant aquests darrers trenta anys ha fet un treball encomiable recuperant les arrels originals del jazz, els vertaders fonaments, el seu codi genètic autèntic, destriant el blat de la palla, i revisant el treball tant injustament oblidat que havien fet els jazzmen pioners (el só, l’expressió, el fraseig, l’atac, el vibrato, el swing,…i fins i tot els temes, les estructures, …). Aquesta adoració per les arrels l’ha portat a obligar als seus alumnes a saber tocar “a la manera de…”, no per imitar, si no per aprofundir en la comprensió del Jazz. Evidentment sense perdre res del que han estat totes les aportacions serioses al desenvolupament del jazz posteriors a l’època del Swing. En aquesta manera de concebre el jazz avui s’han trobat una colla de grandíssims instrumentistes de jazz tots ells molt joves. Per aquesta concepció del Jazz justament ha estat molt criticat pels, podríem dir, “avanguardistes” o gent sense criteri que han obligat als músics de jazz a caure en una mena de pirotècnia musical sense sentit des de fa no menys de cinquanta anys.
Amb la lectura atenta d’aquesta obra podràs explorar el món del jazz amb el guiatge de’n Wynton Marsalis, enriquir-na la visió i comprendre moltes de les coses que ara amb la perspectiva del temps transcorregut i la mirada intel·ligent i solida de’n Wynton adquireixen una nova dimensió.
Per si et vols acabar de convèncer de que cal llegir atentament aquesta obra que ja fa un parell d’anys que corre pel món llegeix a continuació el que en diu en Wynton Marsalis en forma d’interviu que publica en la seva pròpia Web i que trobo que complementa la visió del jazz que ell fonamenta en aquesta obra.
Que en gaudeixis de la lectura que segur t’ajudarà a comprendre molt més el Jazz que, si em permets, en diria autèntic (be, algú ho havia de dir, no?).
========================
Q: You’re a musician and composer. Why did you write this book, which is about life and lots of other things besides jazz?
A: When I first decided to become a musician, at the age of 12 or 13, I was inspired by my father, and by the New Orleans jazz tradition. I was under the impression that I had only to learn the fundamentals of music–rhythm, melody, harmony, texture–to progress as a musician. What I didn’t know then was that over the next three decades, jazz music would teach me many significant things about living. This book grew out of ten years of conversations with my friend Geoff Ward, and is my attempt to share some of it—about how important it is to be yourself in the world, and at the same time create while respecting the creativity of others.

Q: What does the title of this book, Moving to Higher Ground, mean to you?
A: Too often in life, petty squabbles and small-mindedness keep us from realizing a higher purpose. In jazz, that higher purpose is not theoretical: We want to sound good. And when we do, you can hear what it’s like when people are really trying to get along. It’s purely human: In Jazz, you can mess up and still come together, still move together to higher ground. The title means ascending through engagement.

Q: You suggest that the ideas at the heart of jazz can carry over into everyday life. How so?
A: Let’s take two ideas in jazz that are most central: swinging and the blues.
Swinging is the art of negotiation with someone else, under the pressure of time. It shows you how opposites can come together, without compromising who they are. The one who plays the highest-sounding instrument in the rhythm section–the time-keeping cymbal–has to find a way of working with the one who plays the lowest instrument, the bass. And the bass player, who plays the softest instrument, has to find a way of working with the player of the loudest, the drums. To succeed, everybody has to have a very clear idea of the common goal: What exactly are we here to do? In jazz we know: swing. In life, if everyone involved can agree on a primary objective, a group can accomplish almost anything.
The blues is many things–a musical form, a distinctive sound, a universal feeling–but above all, the blues is survival music. It’s message is simple: things are never so bad that they can’t get any better. It’s about crying over something, actually wailing–and it’s about coming back. The words may be sad but the dancing shuffle (the definitive rhythm of the blues) is always happy or heading toward happiness. The blues is about what is–and what is has demons and angels sitting at the same table. That’s a bitter-sweet and realistic message about life that everybody needs, that everybody can hear and respond to. I’ve heard people respond to it, all over the world.

Q: How do jazz principles apply to, say, holding a successful meeting?
A: If you come to a meeting without an agenda it’s probably not going to be a very good meeting. In jazz improvisation, the agenda is the form of the song. But an agenda alone doesn’t guarantee success. If everybody feels free to participate, unexpected things are sure to come up and will have to be dealt with intelligently. That’s true in jazz improvisation, too. Things are bound to come up. Some need to be discarded right away. Others need to be expounded upon. Anyone in the rhythm section playing along behind the soloist can decide, “Hey, we need to investigate this further.” And the soloist can respond, “Yeah, let’s go into that.” It’s a system of checks and balances, but what makes it work is the fact that everybody is listening and responding to what the soloist is saying without ever forgetting the agenda. That’s a pretty good model for swinging, and for getting things done.

Q: How do jazz principles apply to a family?
The central relationship on the bandstand is between the bass and the drums. They’re opposites of volume and register. The drums are the loudest and the swung cymbal is the highest-pitched while the bass is the softest and lowest-pitched. In order to swing, the right-hand stroke on the cymbal must find the right-hand pluck of the bass on every beat. While it is impossible to line those beats up with metronomic perfection it is possible to achieve a perfect intent to be together. That’s what you would like to see with a mama and a daddy. They represent gender opposites. While they try to come together to solve a problem we can go in the direction of a good time. When they don’t–when one is too loud or the other is unyielding–it becomes a matter of endurance, not swinging.

Q: What can jazz teach us about our feelings and ourselves as individuals?
A: We’re all given the gift of creativity. It comes out in all kinds of ways–the way we talk or dress or cook or whistle. I remember when I was a kid my friends and I used to see who could cut grass in the most creative way. But many times young people are put down for having a gift or skill that doesn’t fit with somebody else’s idea of what he or she should do with their lives. Jazz is the opposite of that. It tells you, “That’s you! Take pride in this thing. Express yourself. Your sound is unique. Work on it. Understand it.” Often it teaches you to celebrate yourself.
When we talk about expressing feelings in jazz, we mean spiritual feelings, empathetic feelings, feelings that are beyond thought. In jazz, musical ideas move too quickly for you to stop and analyze or to formulate a lie. By the time you think about it, that moment of music is long gone. Jazz teaches you to cherish how you feel in the moment. It puts a premium on having faith in the people you’re playing with. Because the second you lose that faith and start to question what they’re doing, the distraction takes your mind off the music and onto bad decisions that you will surely begin to make. The combination of emotional honesty and mutual trust that jazz demands can help you if applied to almost any field.

Q: How can jazz help you understand your own friends and family better?
A: At first it may seem like a paradox, but jazz helps you understand other people by teaching you that you never really know anybody. When you play music with someone–even someone you think you know really well–they’ll play things you don’t expect and can’t anticipate. You’ll go in one direction, based on what you think is going to happen and they’ll take a completely different path. Jazz lets people be free, and to surprise you–and them. It doesn’t let you mail in your response or let you lump people into categories that turn out to be meaningless. It also shows you that people, even geniuses, evolve over time. The Duke Ellington who played in 1931 was very different from the Duke of 1961. So you learn to be patient with other people and respect the progress they’ve made and are still capable of making. One of the biggest challenges in dealing with friends and family is communication and more communication. Jazz forces us to communicate with people while recognizing their objectives, and over objectives, and where we can come together.

Q: How is jazz related to America, the country that created it?
A: This art form was created to explain who we are. We have rights and responsibilities in the music just as we do as citizens. The Constitution can be amended and songs can always be added to or changes. In jazz we place a premium on the individual’s right to self-expression but we also insist on checks and balances between one person’s rights infringing on another–the soloists and the rhythm section have to work things out together.

Otherwise the piece is a mess.
Jazz allows us to improvise, to negotiate with one another. It’s the sound of many people coming together in one thing. You might be from Chicago and be Jewish but you can stand on this bandstand with a Creole from New Orleans and when both of y’all play, you’ll agree on what sounds good, and you’ll agree on it because you both can hear it. It’s democracy in action and it allows us, for all our faults, to see the success of our history. It tells us who we have been, who we are now, and who we can be in the future.

Q: Why is jazz especially relevant today?
A: This country is looking for change. Just look at what’s going on: An African American and a woman were leading contenders for the presidency; Big questions of race and identity; millions of brand-new voters turning out. Barack Obama carrying southern states in the primaries with a charismatic message of coming together. It’s a different time in our country and I think it’s the perfect time for this music.
Now, jazz has always been timely because it deals with the timeless issues of people, and of our democracy. Louis Armstrong dealt with them. So did Duke Ellington and Benny Goodman. But if you listen to political candidates today, they almost never talk about culture. It’s never really been part of our national dialogue and it should be, because it’s the best was for us actually to come together. We talk a lot about having national conversations and we’ve tried legislating unity. But we need to understand that art can bring people who are different together. Jazz provides a context for all the experiences we as human beings share.
The direction of our culture is ascendant. Jazz is a perfect embodiment of that. Jazz is ascendant. If we take a long view of the past 150 years, we won’t come to the conclusion that things are getting worse. We still have problems of corruption and greed. Jazz can provide a good antidote for them, too. To maintain their integrity, musicians have had to make many decisions that placed substance over commercial success. Jazz musicians have always aspired to an almost Utopian vision of a country in which everybody would come together and swing.
The contemporary excitement around empowering people is not new to jazz. Jazz is empowerment. Its first great achievement was to empower individual musicians to take part in the creative process through improvisation. Participation is essential to a healthy American democracy, and it’s essential to America’s greatest music, too. Everybody has to participate to make it sound good. Whether you’re playing or listening, you have to be active. If you’re just sitting there and waiting for something to happen, nothing will. I hope this book will empower as many people as possible to take part by showing how an understanding of jazz and its principles can change your life, and our lives together.

Solomon Burke

octubre 10th, 2010 No comments

Solomon Burke, conegut com el “Rey del Rock i el Soul” després del seu “Tonight the night”, ha mort avui (el 10 del 10 del 10) per causes encara desconegudes a  l’Aeroport de Shipol poc després d’aterrar procedent de Los Angeles. Tenia previst actuar el proper dimarts al Club Paradiso d’Amsterdam per presentar el seu darrer treball “Hold on Tight”.
Va ser l’autor de temes tant coneguts com “Cry to me” (1962), “If You Need Me” (1963), “Goodbye Baby” i “Everybody needs somebodoy to love” (1964), o “Got to Get You Off My Mind” (1965). Tenia un físic imponent, pesava més de 200 kg, va estar casat amb tres dones i ha deixat 14 filles, 7 fills, 90 nets i 19 besnéts.
Va néixer el  21 de març de 1940 a Philadelphia (Pensilvania) en el sí d’una família molt religiosa i sota la influencia de la seva àvia Eleanor responsable de l’esglèssia evangelista “United House of Prayer for All People”. Des dels set anys ja cantava a l’esglèssia. El 1954 amb motiu de la mort de la seva àvia va compondre el seu primer tema “Christmas Presents From Heaven”. Com a Predicador conduïa el “Solomon’s Temple”, un show radiofònic de gospel a Philadelphia.
El 1960 el fitxa el productor Jerry Wexler pel segell Atlantic Records on comença una carrera notòria en el Rythm & Blues i encara més especialment en el Soul amb èxits com “Just out of my reach (of my two open arms)” o “Got to get you off my mind”. Va compondre “I have a dream” (1974) en homenatge a Martin Luther King. Després d’uns 30 anys de poca presència mediàtica, torna a dominar l’escena des de 2002 amb “Don’t give up on me”.
Sempre ha compaginat la interpretació amb el servei religiós doncs era l’arquebisbe de la seva pròpia església pentecostal “The House of God for All People” de Los Angeles i ell mateix deia “I’m a church minister first, then an entertainer”. Va mantenir molta relació amb el Vaticà i el 2000 va ser convidat pel Pope Joan Pau II per celebrar la Festa de la Família i posteriorment el Pope Benedicte XVI també el va convidar per Nadal.
En el seu homenatge recullo la seva obra musical publicada des del 1961 que he pogut extreure de Wikipedia:
“Just Out Of Reach (Of My Two Open Arms)”, (1961)

Solomon Burke – 1962 (Apollo)
Solomon Burke’s Greatest Hits – 1962 (Atlantic)
“Cry To Me”
“I’m Hanging Up My Heart For You” / “Down In The Valley”
“I Really Don’t Want To Know”

“If You Need Me”, (1963)
“Can’t Nobody Love You”
“You’re Good For Me”

Rock ‘n’ Soul – 1964 (Atlantic)
“He’ll Have To Go”
“Goodbye Baby (Baby Goodbye)”
“Everybody Needs Somebody To Love”
“Yes I Do”
“The Price”

The Rest of Solomon Burke – 1965 (Atlantic)
“Got To Get You Off My Mind”
“Tonight’s The Night”
“Someone Is Watching”
“Only Love (Can Save Me Now)”

“Baby Come On Home”, (1966)
“I Feel A Sin Coming On”
“Keep Looking”

King Solomon – 1967 (Atlantic)
“Keep A Light In The Window Till I Come Home”, (1967)
“Take Me (Just As I Am)”
“Detroit City”

I Wish I Knew – 1968 (Atlantic)
“I Wish I Knew (How It Would Feel To Be Free)”

Proud Mary – 1969 (Bell)
“Up Tight Good Woman”
“Proud Mary”

“The Electronic Magnetism (That’s Heavy, Baby)”, (1971). MGM

Cool Breeze [soundtrack] – 1972
“Love’s Street And Fool’s Road”
“We’re Almost Home”
“Get Up And Do Something For Yourself”

“Shambala”, (1973)

I Have A Dream – 1974 (ABC/Dunhill)
“Midnight And You”

Music To Make Love By – 1975 (Chess)
“You And Your Baby Blues”
“Let Me Wrap My Arms Around You”

Back To My Roots – 1976 (Chess)

“Please Don’t You Say Goodbye To Me”, (1978). Amherst

Sidewalks, Fences And Walls – 1979 (Infinity)
Lord, I Need Need A Miracle Right Now – 1979 (Savoy)

Into My Life You Came – 1982 (Savoy)
Take Me, Shake Me – 1983 (Savoy)
This Is His Song – 1984 (Savoy)
Soul Alive!

A Change is Gonna Come – 1986 (Rounder)
Love Trap – 1987 (MCI/Isis-Voice)
Homeland – 1991 (Bizarre/Straight)
Soul Of the Blues – 1993 (Black Top)
Live At The House Of The Blues – 1994 (Black Top)
The Definition Of Soul – 1997 (Point Blank)

Not By Water But Fire This Time – 1999 (GTR)
Christmas All Over The World

The Commitment – 2001 (GTR)
Don’t Give Up on Me – 2002 (Fat Possum/ANTI-)
Make Do With What You Got – 2005 (Shout! Factory)
Nashville – 2006 (Shout! Factory)
Like A Fire – 2008 (Shout! Factory)

Nothing’s Impossible – 2010 (E1)
Hold on Tight (with De Dijk) – 2010 (Universal Music)

Steve Pistorius

maig 14th, 2010 No comments

Sometimes I feel like a motherless child

març 26th, 2010 No comments


motherless-child_sheet

“Sometimes I feel like a Motherless child” és un d’aquells temes commovedors que quan el sents atreu fortament l’atenció, quedes emotivament impressionat i acabes escoltant-lo. És llavors, quan realment l’escoltes atentament, que el seu colpidor i fàcilment comprensible missatge et fa descobrir la profunditat de la història que explica la cançó i et permet comprendre el gran patiment del poble negre afronortamericà.
Tot i que el tema està considerat com un negro espiritual tradicional, hi ha estudis que demostren que ja es cantava als inicis del segle XVIII. Com moltes d’altres cançons populars “paganes” fou recollida en el repertori de les esglésies evangelistes que a partir de l’abolició de l’esclavatge van anar proliferant, de tal manera que la cançó cap a mitjans del segle XIX ja era àmpliament coneguda i cantada habitualment en les esglésies, d’aquí que finalment hagi passat a ser considerada un gospel. La lletra original de la cançó explica el sentiment d’orfe d’un nen o nena negre que ha estat arrencat de la seva mare i venut a algú altre. Aquest drama tant generalitzat en l’època feia que la cançó fos sentida com una història personal o molt propera entre la comunitat negre.

En el text de la cançó s’utilitza repetidament la noció “sometimes” quan en realitat es tracta d’un destí definitiu i irreversible, els analistes consideren que el recurs a aquesta figura és representativa de la psicologia de l’esperança de l’esclau negre, de la resignació en que havia de viure per la impotència de poder transformar-la. El nen diu: em sento orfe però no sempre, tant sols “de vegades”.

Però a la vegada el text té un sentit figuratiu i assimila aquest drama personal al col·lectiu pel fet d’haver estat arrencats de la seva mare Àfrica, deportats al Continent Americà, venuts com esclaus i ser tractats com animals. Lògicament de nou l’esperança de poder retornar algun dia a la seva terra (“A long way from home, true believer”).

(Font: a) pel que fa a la partitura ; b) pel que fa als continguts ).

Segons l’”Anthologie des grilles de jazz” l’estructura de la cançó en les versions jazzístiques varia entre 10 o 15 compassos, depenent de si es toca tant sols el tema principal que és de 10 compassos o be si afegeix un compas i a continuació es repeteixen els quatre darrers compassos del tema. La tonalitat de referència és Fm.
A continuació el text segons la versió de INGEB :

|: Sometimes I feel
Like a motherless child :|
Sometimes I feel
Like a motherless child
|: A Long Way From Home :|
True Believer
|: A Long Way From Home :|

|: Sometimes I feel
Like a motherless child
Sometimes I feel
Like a motherless child :|

|: Sometimes I wish I could fly,
Like a bird up in the sky :|
Sometimes I wish I could fly,
Like a bird in the sky
Little closer to home

|: Motherless children
Have a real hard time :|
Motherless children
Have a such a real hard time
So long so long so long

|: Sometimes I feel
Like a motherless child :|
Sometimes I feel
Like a motherless child
So far away

|: Sometimes I feel
Like freedom is near :|
Sometimes I feel
Like freedom is near
But we’re so far away

|: Sometimes I feel
Like it’s close at hand :|
Sometimes I feel
Like the freedom is near
But we’re so far from home

|: Sometimes, sometimes, |
Sometimes
|: So far, so far, so far, :|
So far Mama from you, so far

A continuació la magistral interpretació de Louis Pops Armstrong sobre un arranjament impecable de Sy Oliver que es va publicar en el “Louis and the Good Book”:
Aquesta cançò popular negra afroamericana, cap l’any 1933 o 1935, la va utilitzar George Gershwin per escriure “Summertime” el tema principal de l’opera “Porgy and Bess” en la que pretenia descriure idíl·licament una història d’amor entre una dòcil parella de negres, el contrafet Porgy i la exuberant i bella Bess (a la qual li anava al darrera el propietari de l’adrogueria on hi treballava, o sigui racisme amanit d’assetjament sexual en el treball). Evidentment era una bonica història adreçada al públic benestant blanc. La lletra és de DuBose Heyward que té la virtut de transformar la trista cançó original d’un nen o nena orfa com a figura per denunciar el racisme, en una bucòlica cançó de bressol que canta la mare (la Bess) al seu nadó. La lletra no pot ser més banal i cursi:

“Summertime,
And the livin’ is easy
Fish are jumpin’
And the cotton is high

Your daddy’s rich
And your mamma’s good lookin’
So hush little baby
Don’t you cry

One of these mornings
You’re going to rise up singing
Then you’ll spread your wings
And you’ll take to the sky

But till that morning
There’s a’nothing can harm you
With daddy and mamma standing by

Summertime,
And the livin’ is easy
Fish are jumpin’
And the cotton is high

Your daddy’s rich
And your mamma’s good lookin’
So hush little baby
Don’t you cry”

“Summertime” ja té una estructura estandaritzada de 16ABAC (sovint considerada 16AB segons com es miri) més còmode que la original de “Motherless child”.

Trobo que aquesta última història de l’apropiació d’elements de la cultura popular negre per part de la cultura benestant i poderosa nortamericana, blanca off course, ha estat una constant en la història de la música negre afronortamericana, i ens retorna a la versió original “Motherless child” (orfes de la mare Àfrica) si be en aquest cas, els orfes són els fills culturals.
Una vegada més la resignació, aquest plagio humiliant en lloc d’haver provocat la indignació va ser admés o si més no els músics negres van interpretar “Summertime” com si rés haguera passat (bussiness is bussiness), un exemple pot ser la versió de Mahalia Jackson que enllaço a continuació en que ella, que havia cantat des de ben petita la versió original de “Motherless child” i sabia el que representava, en aquesta interpretació l’enllaça magistralment amb “Summertime” certament de forma commovedora: